# Difference between revisions of "F opt"

Miguel Caro (talk | contribs) (Created page with "The <code>f_opt</code> keyword determines whether a "self-consistent sigma" calculation is performed to optimize the effective '''translational''' hard-sphere diameters of the...") |
Miguel Caro (talk | contribs) |
||

Line 1: | Line 1: | ||

The <code>f_opt</code> keyword determines whether a "self-consistent sigma" calculation is performed to optimize the effective '''translational''' hard-sphere diameters of the different components (<code>f_opt = .true.</code>, which is also the default) as presented in Ref. <ref name="caro_2016" />, or instead the simpler treatment of Lai et al.<ref name="lai_2012" />, which follows the monocomponent formalism, is used (<code>f_opt = .false.</code>). For the effective ''rotational'' hard-sphere diameters, see <code>[[f_opt_rot]]</code>. | The <code>f_opt</code> keyword determines whether a "self-consistent sigma" calculation is performed to optimize the effective '''translational''' hard-sphere diameters of the different components (<code>f_opt = .true.</code>, which is also the default) as presented in Ref. <ref name="caro_2016" />, or instead the simpler treatment of Lai et al.<ref name="lai_2012" />, which follows the monocomponent formalism, is used (<code>f_opt = .false.</code>). For the effective ''rotational'' hard-sphere diameters, see <code>[[f_opt_rot]]</code>. | ||

+ | |||

+ | == Monocomponent hard-sphere diameter == | ||

+ | |||

+ | In the original 2PT paper by Lin et al.<ref name="lin_2003" />, the effective hard-sphere diameter of a monocomponent system (all molecules/groups are the same) is not explicitly calculated. Instead, the fluidicity is uniquely defined from the thermodynamic state of the system, <math>N,V,T</math>, and the (translational) zero-frequency density of states, <math>S_\text{trn}(0)</math>. | ||

== References == | == References == | ||

{{Reference list}} | {{Reference list}} |

## Revision as of 13:36, 16 May 2019

The `f_opt`

keyword determines whether a "self-consistent sigma" calculation is performed to optimize the effective **translational** hard-sphere diameters of the different components (`f_opt = .true.`

, which is also the default) as presented in Ref. ^{[1]}, or instead the simpler treatment of Lai et al.^{[2]}, which follows the monocomponent formalism, is used (`f_opt = .false.`

). For the effective *rotational* hard-sphere diameters, see `f_opt_rot`

.

## Monocomponent hard-sphere diameter

In the original 2PT paper by Lin et al.^{[3]}, the effective hard-sphere diameter of a monocomponent system (all molecules/groups are the same) is not explicitly calculated. Instead, the fluidicity is uniquely defined from the thermodynamic state of the system, [math]N,V,T[/math], and the (translational) zero-frequency density of states, [math]S_\text{trn}(0)[/math].

## References

- ↑
M.A. Caro, T. Laurila, and O. Lopez-Acevedo.
*Accurate schemes for calculation of thermodynamic properties of liquid mixtures from molecular dynamics simulations*. J. Chem. Phys.**145**, 244504 (2016). - ↑
P.-K. Lai, C.-M. Hsieh and S.-T. Lin.
*Rapid determination of entropy and free energy of mixtures from molecular dynamics simulations with the two-phase thermodynamic model*. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.**14**, 15206 (2012). - ↑
S.-T. Lin, M. Blanco and W.A. Goddard III.
*The two-phase model for calculating thermodynamic properties of liquids from molecular dynamics: Validation for the phase diagram of Lennard-Jones fluids*. J. Chem. Phys.**119**, 11792 (2003).